SANEsters,
Ahem, earlier today I reported:
The meeting date is Tuesday, 1 January 2007
Astute reader Mary M. from Beantown, MA reports that:
Tuesday is 2 January 2007, just so there's no confusion
Thanks to Mary for pointing out the error (and who am I calling an "astute"?), but recipients who looked only at the Subject would have seen a third date (1/9/2007), which is, in fact, the correct date!
So the first line SHOULD HAVE READ:
The meeting date is Tuesday, 9 January 2007, at Richard's (or if elsewhere, I will renotify).
All the rest of the crap is still the same, as/so far as I know.
No comments:
Post a Comment